Re: [orbitcpp-list] General information
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
philipd
From: Phil D. <ph...@us...> - 2001-01-30 14:54:38
|
Paz Offer writes: > Hi, > > I have a very general questions regarding using ORBit - I would be very > gratefull for any response. > > My environment is a PDA class device operating Linux, on Arm based platform. > (I estimate that my RAM and disc space would be around 16~32MB each) > > I done a brief reading about the ORBit/CPP product. From what I read I think > that this product can suit my needs. > > My questions: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > 1. What state is this product now - I understand it was not released yet. > Is it stable, is it expected to be released soon? It is stable, orbitcpp-0.30 will be released soon (in fact, I'll release it when ORBit-0.5.7 is released). > 2. Using this product I understand that Client AND Server can be written in > C++ (?) Yes > 3. Does the product suport also the activation of in-proc servants? > Does it actualy locate the DLL load it to memory and create the instance? > [I am new to the CORBA field, so excuse if I have a misunderstanding > here..] There is a secondary ORBit package called 'oaf' (object activation framework) which does this. orbitcpp *should* work with this, but AFAIK this is untested. I plan on working on this next (implementation repository based on oaf). (In case you don't know, ORBit is a small fast C ORB, orbitcpp provides c++ support for ORBit) > 4. Is the product fully CORBA compliant? > It is fully compliant in that everything implemented is CORBA spec compliant. There are some notable features in 2.3 not implemented in orbitcpp - DynAny and value types are examples. You also may have problems with anonymous sequence members (untested). > Thanks in advanced for any response! > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > You're welcome, Cheers, Phil |