Re: [orbitcpp-list] Understanding orbit-c++
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
philipd
From: Adam Y. <ay...@fo...> - 2000-07-26 22:41:47
|
THis is the compile command that fails. c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -g -O0 -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/orbitcpp_tools.pp -c orbitcpp_tools.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/orbitcpp_tools.lo Is --with-orbit-prefix=/usr/local/devel required? I'm a little unclear through all the emails. Are there other params to configure that are required (for ORBit to find glib, etc) BTW I'm running: gcc --version 2.95.2 I get a lot of these : configure.in:93: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling > > IN the configure output I found this snippet: > > *** Your copy of orbit-idl doesn't support --backenddir > > *** This means that you will have to install the C++ idl compiler > > back-end > > *** (with 'make install') before you can build the tests. > > > > Is this indicitave of it not finding the right ORBit code? > > > > Yes! The CVS head version of ORBit definitely has --with-orbit-prefix. > > Hmmm... > <gets off his arse and attempts to build ORBit/orbitcpp from scratch> > > I may have the answer: > I've just attempted to do this on a fresh redhat 6.2 system with helix > gnome, and helix gnome comes with ORBit-0.5.2. The problem is that the > ORBit in CVS head is fixed at 0.5.1 for some god-only-knows reason. This > means that the configure script gets confused (and prints out a verbose > warning msg), but ultimately doesn't stick the correct include and lib > directives into the makefiles. > > I fixed this by editing the ORBIT_MICRO_VERSION variable in ORBit > configure.in from 1 to 2, which fixed the problem. > Hmm, Well that describes my configuration. But I tried that too and it didn't run. (I also tried setting it to 3) SOmething is fooling configure into not picking up the stuff from the /usr/local/devel directory. I'll also try it with the latest CVS of ORBit. Adam |