Re: [orbitcpp-list] Postmortem

[Adam Y. <ay...@fo...>]

No no, I'm still; around.  Just the postmortem on the issue I filled
everyone's inbox with.. 2.96 was required for Mico development.  I didn
;t realize I still had a non supported gcc.  I've reformed my ways...for
now.

Adam





Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 06:24:05PM -0700, Adam Young wrote:
> > Don't try it with GCC 2.96
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > orbitcpp-list mailing list
> > orb...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/orbitcpp-list
> >
> 
> I've checked the gcc homepage yesterday, they didn't say anything about
> 2.96 being out, nor did their ftp site carry it. :?
> 
> andy
> 
> PS: btw, what do you mean by "postmortem"? is that "bye folks, i'm going
> for another project"?
> 
> --
> Don't innovate, intimidate.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> orbitcpp-list mailing list
> orb...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/orbitcpp-list