Re: [orbitcpp-list] announcing o2cpp

[Phil d. <ph...@us...>]

Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> 
> Hi Phil,
> 
> > I'm currently doing a prototype (proof-of-concept) with the current
> > ORBit-C++ runtime and the string test. I wanted prove that it would work
> > before committing anything to CVS.
> >
> > Would it be okay from your standpoint to add your compiler to the
> > ORBit-C++ source tree and then refactor the runtime from that?
> 
> Certainly. Yet, some feeling tells me that it would probably be better
> to leave the "official" ORBit-C++ cvs alone for people to use until the
> new thing is up and running. why not use your sourceforge cvs for
> building the new "call-me-experimental" source tree until then?
> 

Sounds like a good idea. I'm tempted to call the cvs tree 'orbitcpp'
rather than ORBit-C++. I think standardisation on an internal name
without capital letters or punctuation marks is a 'good thing' (tm).

> >
> > BTW, Do you have gnome cvs access?
> 
> nope.
> 

Do you have a sourceforge account? (http://www.sourceforge.net)

(N.B. you need secure shell (SSH) installed to get a the sourceforge cvs
tree)

Cheers,

Phil.