Re: [Orbit-python-list] Uploaded patch

[Jason T. <ta...@li...>]

> - there's a leak somewhere related to the creation of new CORBA
>   objects.  Also one related to activation/deactivation of said
>   objects.  Also one related to servant_to_reference (), apparently.

I'll have a look at this today.

>   Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't they already partially
> implemented by yours truly?  I got an illumination last night, that my

Yup.  I realized this too last night whilest falling asleep. :)

> heh heh...).  Is it OK (as per the specs) to call self._get_thingy()
> if it's defined and to directly return the value of self.thingy if
> it's not?  Ah, I'll have to get the specs and patch server.c (around

If I understand you correctly (and I probably don't), the answer is no.
AFAIK, there's no provision for a user defined interface function in the
form of _get_whatever.  In fact, I seem to recall something saying you
can't have functions that begin with underscores, which is why the
accessor functions are in this form.

Cheers,
Jason.