From: <no...@so...> - 2002-02-12 01:58:56
|
Bugs item #516270, was opened at 2002-02-11 17:54 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=516270&group_id=16191 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Philippe Elie (phil_e) Assigned to: Philippe Elie (phil_e) >Summary: no support for separate-pid profiling e.g. for threaded app Initial Comment: Actually we can not profile each distinct instance of an application. This is especially usefull for multi-thread applications. That's a features request rather a bug report but for convenience I put it here. (John given me a very good rationale to put it here ;) Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: John Levon (movement) Date: 2002-02-11 17:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=53034 Change the title to something more accurate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=516270&group_id=16191 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-03-01 16:36:19
|
Bugs item #516270, was opened at 2002-02-12 01:54 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=516270&group_id=16191 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Philippe Elie (phil_e) Assigned to: Philippe Elie (phil_e) Summary: no support for separate-pid profiling e.g. for threaded app Initial Comment: Actually we can not profile each distinct instance of an application. This is especially usefull for multi-thread applications. That's a features request rather a bug report but for convenience I put it here. (John given me a very good rationale to put it here ;) Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: John Levon (movement) Date: 2002-03-01 16:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=53034 How do we do this without a huge performance drain (3/4 new sample files every time I do "ls") ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Levon (movement) Date: 2002-02-12 01:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=53034 Change the title to something more accurate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=516270&group_id=16191 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-10-24 07:46:18
|
Bugs item #516270, was opened at 2002-02-12 01:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by movement You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=516270&group_id=16191 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Philippe Elie (phil_e) Assigned to: Philippe Elie (phil_e) Summary: no support for separate-pid profiling e.g. for threaded app Initial Comment: Actually we can not profile each distinct instance of an application. This is especially usefull for multi-thread applications. That's a features request rather a bug report but for convenience I put it here. (John given me a very good rationale to put it here ;) Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: John Levon (movement) Date: 2003-10-23 15:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=53034 Fixed in 0.7 release ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Levon (movement) Date: 2002-03-01 16:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=53034 How do we do this without a huge performance drain (3/4 new sample files every time I do "ls") ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Levon (movement) Date: 2002-02-12 01:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=53034 Change the title to something more accurate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=116191&aid=516270&group_id=16191 |