From: William C. <wc...@re...> - 2009-03-12 14:47:17
|
Is oprofile cvs having problems? I tried to checked out from cvs, and got: cvs checkout: warning: cannot write to history file /cvsroot/oprofile/CVSROOT/history: Read-only file system cvs checkout: Updating oprofile cvs checkout: failed to create lock directory for `/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile' (/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile/#cvs.lock): Read-only file system cvs checkout: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile' cvs [checkout aborted]: read lock failed - giving up This was for both as me and as an anonymous user following the instructions at: http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/download/ Something get messed up on the sourceforge? Looks similar to this what is going on this email thread: http://n2.nabble.com/cvs-lock-td2462351.html -Will |
From: Maynard J. <may...@us...> - 2009-03-12 18:03:40
|
William Cohen wrote: > Is oprofile cvs having problems? I tried to checked out from cvs, and got: Yup. See http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/. -Maynard > > cvs checkout: warning: cannot write to history file > /cvsroot/oprofile/CVSROOT/history: Read-only file system > cvs checkout: Updating oprofile > cvs checkout: failed to create lock directory for `/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile' > (/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile/#cvs.lock): Read-only file system > cvs checkout: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile' > cvs [checkout aborted]: read lock failed - giving up > > This was for both as me and as an anonymous user following the instructions at: > > http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/download/ > > Something get messed up on the sourceforge? Looks similar to this what is going > on this email thread: > > http://n2.nabble.com/cvs-lock-td2462351.html > > -Will > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > _______________________________________________ > oprofile-list mailing list > opr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list |
From: Maynard J. <may...@us...> - 2009-03-13 13:41:17
|
Maynard Johnson wrote: > William Cohen wrote: >> Is oprofile cvs having problems? I tried to checked out from cvs, and got: > Yup. See http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/. SourceForge cvs service is working again. -Maynard > > -Maynard >> cvs checkout: warning: cannot write to history file >> /cvsroot/oprofile/CVSROOT/history: Read-only file system >> cvs checkout: Updating oprofile >> cvs checkout: failed to create lock directory for `/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile' >> (/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile/#cvs.lock): Read-only file system >> cvs checkout: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvsroot/oprofile/oprofile' >> cvs [checkout aborted]: read lock failed - giving up >> >> This was for both as me and as an anonymous user following the instructions at: >> >> http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/download/ >> >> Something get messed up on the sourceforge? Looks similar to this what is going >> on this email thread: >> >> http://n2.nabble.com/cvs-lock-td2462351.html >> >> -Will >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are >> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and >> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development >> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. >> Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com >> _______________________________________________ >> oprofile-list mailing list >> opr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > _______________________________________________ > oprofile-list mailing list > opr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list |
From: Andi K. <an...@fi...> - 2009-03-18 00:21:35
|
William Cohen <wc...@re...> writes: > Is oprofile cvs having problems? I tried to checked out from cvs, and got: I ran into the same problem, but luckily still had an alternative checkout and ended up diffing manually. Also to be honest after using git/quilt for quite some time for kernel work I find CVS very awkward to use. Modern VCS are much nicer. I did this for my own work oprofile on kernel.org already http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ak/oprofile.git;a=summary (e.g. for the Atom/Nehalem branches) This was done using the git cvs import tool, which worked fine on the CVS oprofile repository. How about just moving oprofile CVS to git and putting it up on kernel.org? I'm sure the kernel.org maintainers would be supporting. -Andi -- ak...@li... -- Speaking for myself only. |
From: John L. <le...@mo...> - 2009-03-18 01:09:03
|
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:46:18AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > How about just moving oprofile CVS to git and putting it up on kernel.org? > I'm sure the kernel.org maintainers would be supporting. Does kernel.org provide gitweb and user management stuff just like sourceforge? i.e. would we lose anything from this. regards john |
From: Andi K. <an...@fi...> - 2009-03-18 02:01:38
|
[cc hpa] On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:08:39PM -0400, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:46:18AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > How about just moving oprofile CVS to git and putting it up on kernel.org? > > I'm sure the kernel.org maintainers would be supporting. > > Does kernel.org provide gitweb and user management stuff just like It provides gitweb. For accounts you have to send an email, but there's a well established procedure to do so. I assume the number of oprofile comitters are limited anyways, doesn't only Maynard commit anyways? > sourceforge? i.e. would we lose anything from this. I think oprofile would only gain. -Andi -- ak...@li... -- Speaking for myself only. |
From: John L. <le...@mo...> - 2009-03-18 02:53:01
|
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:37:14AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > How about just moving oprofile CVS to git and putting it up on kernel.org? > > > I'm sure the kernel.org maintainers would be supporting. > > > > Does kernel.org provide gitweb and user management stuff just like > > It provides gitweb. For accounts you have to send an > email, but there's a well established procedure to do so. OK, sounds fine. > I assume the number of oprofile comitters are limited anyways, > doesn't only Maynard commit anyways? Several people currently have commit rights, though it probably makes sense for it to be on a as-needed basis if it is moved to git. Note the website is also currently in CVS. There's two other modules but they're kind of historical. regards john |
From: Bert W. <ber...@go...> - 2009-03-18 08:44:41
|
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 03:52, John Levon <le...@mo...> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:37:14AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> > > How about just moving oprofile CVS to git and putting it up on kernel.org? >> > > I'm sure the kernel.org maintainers would be supporting. >> > >> > Does kernel.org provide gitweb and user management stuff just like SF added support git recently: http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git Bert |