From: Adrian Reber <adrian@li...> - 2007-02-08 18:01:34
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:21:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Moving the sample rate computation to user space sounds like the right
> idea, but why not have a more drastic version of it:
> Right now, all products that support this feature run at the same clock
> rate (3.2 Ghz), with cpufreq, we can reduce this to 1.6 Ghz. If I understand
> this correctly, the value depends only on the frequency, so we could simply
> hardcode this in the kernel, and print out a warning message if we ever
> encounter a different frequency, right?
Just for the record... CAB is running with 2.8 GHz. At least all the boards
I have seen.