From: Sundeep P. <sp...@sa...> - 2005-02-09 21:19:36
|
Hi all, In the output reported by opreport, I'm seeing a high sample count of __libc_mallopt as shown below: 809946 7.6091 libc-2.3.2.so __libc_mallopt I'm fairly sure that this function isn't being called. I've double-checked by setting a breakpoint and it doesn't show up. Are there any known bugs with oprofile where it misreports symbols? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. thanks, Sundeep |
From: John L. <le...@mo...> - 2005-02-09 23:54:27
|
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:19:26PM -0600, Sundeep Peechu wrote: > In the output reported by opreport, I'm seeing a high sample count of > __libc_mallopt as shown below: > > 809946 7.6091 libc-2.3.2.so __libc_mallopt > > I'm fairly sure that this function isn't being called. I've > double-checked by setting a breakpoint and it doesn't show up. > > Are there any known bugs with oprofile where it misreports symbols? Any > feedback would be greatly appreciated. There's no known bug. Create an oparchive, and send me the results privately. john |