From: John L. <mo...@co...> - 2001-10-02 18:00:44
|
http://www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~moz/oprofile-0.0.5.tar.gz please take the time to check this tarball out and report any problems. thanks john -- " It is quite humbling to realize that the storage occupied by the longest line from a typical Usenet posting is sufficient to provide a state space so vast that all the computation power in the world can not conquer it." - Dave Wallace |
From: Philippe E. <ph...@cl...> - 2001-10-02 20:37:09
|
From: "John Levon" <mo...@co...> > http://www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~moz/oprofile-0.0.5.tar.gz > > please take the time to check this tarball out and report > any problems. oprofpp -l is bad: when more than one samples files counters is available it use always the first samples files opened. I'am commiting for this Phil |
From: Philippe E. <ph...@cl...> - 2001-10-02 21:26:12
|
> > http://www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~moz/oprofile-0.0.5.tar.gz > > > > please take the time to check this tarball out and report > > any problems. > > oprofpp -l is bad: when more than one samples files counters is available it use > always the first samples files opened. I'am commiting for this oops, I have commit a minot change to make the output as in the last version I have compared output of oprofpp -L -l -s and the variant of op_to_source. from your cvs tarball with the last patch against an older cvs. Things look like ok. Phil |