Re: Adding support for a new cpu, enum op_cpu

[Philippe E. <ph...@wa...>]

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 at 15:01 +0000, Will Cohen wrote:

> It looks like are some other violators of this in the libop/op_cpu_type.h:

>          CPU_PPC64_POWER5, /**< ppc64 POWER5 family */
> +       CPU_PPC64_POWER5p, /**< ppc64 Power5+ family */
>          CPU_PPC64_970, /**< ppc64 970 family */
> +       CPU_MIPS_20K, /**< MIPS 20K */
>          CPU_MIPS_24K, /**< MIPS 24K */
> +       CPU_MIPS_25K, /**< MIPS 25K */
> +       CPU_MIPS_34K, /**< MIPS 34K */
> +       CPU_MIPS_5K, /**< MIPS 5K */
>          CPU_MIPS_R10000, /**< MIPS R10000 */

 
> Looks like there is going to be some imcompatibility between versions if this 
> being changed to put the new entries at the end of the enum.
> 
> Or do we just want to fix up CPU_FAMILY10 in cvs and leave the other violators 
> alone?

Those are too old to be changed, when fixing family10, add a comment
explaining why new cpu must be added at the end.

--
Philippe Elie