From: John Levon <levon@mo...> - 2004-09-27 20:23:55
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:48:04PM -0600, Jimmy DeWitt wrote:
> We will post our three proposals as separate threads.
Thanks for writing this stuff up.
I'm not sure this is the best naming but we can work through these
> Possible options for oprofiled:
> 1) Maintain samples as offsets. Minimal post processing modifications.
> - Create an "elf" or map-like file itself or require that one be
> 2) Maintain samples as VMAs and let the post processing sort it out.
> 3) Interface with oprofiled, producing an anonymous address database
> - This work could be in oprofiled or a shared library which the
> could register address to name, offset and other information and
> the daemon could
> query from it to translate the VMA to an offset.
As you know, 1) is my favourite here. I've commented in proposal 1's
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.