I am having trouble running profiling tools on the kernel with the rt29
patch. I am running on an Intel Core 2 machine.  I run oprofile and received the following kernel oops when
starting the oprofile daemon. Here is the log info:
oprofile: using NMI interrupt.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:707
pcnt: 2 0 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 4020, name: oprofiled
Pid: 4020, comm: oprofiled Not tainted #3
Call Trace:
[<c104e8c4>] ? rt_spin_lock_fastlock+0x26/0x58
[<c108ff56>] ? _slab_irq_disable+0x22/0x42
[<c109108a>] ? __kmalloc+0x7d/0xf0
[<e0071529>] ? ppro_setup_ctrs+0x29/0x1b8 [oprofile]
[<e0071529>] ? ppro_setup_ctrs+0x29/0x1b8 [oprofile]
[<e0070e8d>] ? nmi_cpu_setup+0x87/0xcc [oprofile]
[<e0070e06>] ? nmi_cpu_setup+0x0/0xcc [oprofile]
[<c102fa7b>] ? on_each_cpu+0x25/0x50
[<e0070dd9>] ? nmi_setup+0x11d/0x14a [oprofile]
[<e006f133>] ? oprofile_setup+0x2d/0x86 [oprofile]
[<e006fede>] ? event_buffer_open+0x42/0x60 [oprofile]
[<c109363d>] ? __dentry_open+0x1a4/0x29a
[<c109b09b>] ? generic_permission+0xc/0x7e
[<c10937c1>] ? nameidata_to_filp+0x27/0x38
[<e006fe9c>] ? event_buffer_open+0x0/0x60 [oprofile]
[<c109d214>] ? do_filp_open+0x439/0x843
[<c10808f6>] ? __do_fault+0x2bf/0x2ef
[<c1090091>] ? slab_irq_enable+0x45/0x79
[<c10933a2>] ? do_sys_open+0x4c/0xe4
[<c109347e>] ? sys_open+0x1e/0x23
[<c1002750>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26


When I run perf record I get a slightly different kernel oops. Here is the relevant log info:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:9
pcnt: 14010003 0 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 3640, name: perf
Pid: 3640, comm: perf Not tainted #3
Call Trace:
[<c101d0c3>] ? kmap+0x41/0x52
[<c100b66e>] ? perf_callchain+0x20d/0x2ac
[<c106abd9>] ? perf_prepare_sample+0x1d1/0x23b
[<c106ce0b>] ? __perf_event_overflow+0x20a/0x25e
[<c106d4bc>] ? perf_event_overflow+0xf/0x12
[<c100c906>] ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x1fd/0x25d
[<c100b7a3>] ? intel_pmu_enable_all+0x3d/0xae
[<c1386478>] ? perf_event_nmi_handler+0x34/0x3f
[<c13877dd>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x2a/0x47
[<c138781e>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x24/0x33
[<c1387836>] ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0xc
[<c1387869>] ? notify_die+0x30/0x34
[<c1385c75>] ? do_nmi+0x73/0x25f
[<c13858a9>] ? nmi_stack_correct+0x28/0x2d
[<c100b7a3>] ? intel_pmu_enable_all+0x3d/0xae
[<c100afda>] ? hw_perf_enable+0xf/0x10
[<c1069b42>] ? __perf_event_sched_in+0x10c/0x119
[<c1069b7a>] ? perf_event_task_sched_in+0x2b/0x31
[<c1024088>] ? finish_task_switch+0x2b/0x72
[<c1383d18>] ? __schedule+0x55f/0x5c3
[<c1024c79>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x2b5/0x2bf
[<c1384f5b>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xd/0x23
[<c1383e0e>] ? preempt_schedule+0x40/0x5a
[<c13848f1>] ? rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x37/0x44
[<c109a317>] ? pipe_release+0x7c/0x84
[<c109598a>] ? __fput+0xe7/0x17b
[<c10932b5>] ? filp_close+0x4e/0x54
[<c109331d>] ? sys_close+0x62/0x9b
[<c1002750>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
Both perf and oprofile appear to collect data successfully although when I ran
perf on a long-running program it generated the same kernel oops multiple times
and eventually the machine hung.

I would appreciate any guidance that you can give.  
Best Regards,
Minnie Ho