From: Michael G. <ga...@ma...> - 2006-07-28 17:41:06
|
Caching can't hurt, but I'd also take another look at the pg processing engine --it's pretty old code by now That's actually a caching problem as well -- but at the moment we're only caching a fraction of the code so perl has to recompile about about half the pg code each time. Take care, Mike On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:16 AM, Sam Hathaway wrote: > I was thinking that a solution to this would be to cache the entire > output of the problem processor. For non-interactive situations like > SetMaker, the only thing we'd need to cache on is the problem seed -- > other data (like num_correct, num_incorrect, etc.) are always the > same. |