From: Davide P. C. <dp...@un...> - 2006-02-15 22:42:04
|
> The procedure I gave for committing a change to two different > branches is somewhat cumbersome. I found myself instead maintaining > two up-to-date working copies, one on rel-2-2-dev and one on MAIN, > and doing like this: ... I agree with you, I used the procedure you outline for my first few updates, but found that I was never certain that things had been left the way that they were supposed to be. So I did essentially the same that you did: ran two separate versions, one a copy of MAIN and one a copy of the developer version. > The rel-2-2-dev branch and the MAIN branch remained largely > identical, indicating that no one was doing any "new" development > during the freeze period. I still think it was good to start the - > dev branch when we did, just in case new development is taking > place in parallel. Yes, I think you are right to do this. I had considered some changes to the Parser that I would not want to have put into the 2.2 release and would have used just the MAIN branch, but just didn't have time to get to them. Davide |