Re: [WWdevel] time for 2.2.0?

[Michael G. <ga...@ma...>]

I take it back.  As far as I can tell by searching the CVS
the edit link has always been at the bottom.  My memory is playing
tricks on me.

let's leave it as it is and release 2.2

We'll fix the edit link later.

Take care,

Mike

On Feb 9, 2006, at 7:50 PM, Michael Gage wrote:

> Could we fix the misplaced [edit] link first?  Otherwise people are  
> going to search for it in the new release since it's different from  
> what they are used to.
> Bug 978
>
> Otherwise it has been working fine on hosted.
>
> Take care,
>
> Mike
>
> On Feb 9, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Davide P. Cervone wrote:
>
>>> The 2.2 branch seems stable. I think it's time to release 2.2.0.  
>>> Is there anything you'd like to see fixed before we do release?
>>
>> I think it's ready to go.
>>
>> Davide
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through  
>> log files
>> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD  
>> SPLUNK!
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
>> cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenWeBWorK-Devel mailing list
>> Ope...@li...
>> https://lists.sf.net/lists/listinfo/openwebwork-devel
>
> "Only dead fish swim with the stream."
>

"Only dead fish swim with the stream."