From: Davide P. C. <dp...@un...> - 2006-01-05 21:03:56
|
> I think this release should be 2.2. It has a few major non-bug-fix > features, like gateway testing (including database changes), the > removal of deprecated database layouts, and jsMath updates > (including the new fonts tarball). That sounds good. > However, in my opinion, we're not ready for a "final" 2.2 release, > since many changes went in after fall semester ended, and therefore > haven't received much testing. I also agree. Out faculty had some serious problems with the PG Editor when they started using it this week, and there are a number of problems with it. I'll try to write something up soon. I don't usually use the PG editor myself, but when I did, I really found it difficult and confusing. I think I have a version that works the way I expect it to, but was planning to use it a bit longer before making suggested changes. > I'd also like to tweak the way we track releases in CVS for this > series. I'm happy to do whatever you ask, and I appreciate the examples, as I don't know CVS well enough to be sure I'm doing it properly. Davide |