From: Michael G. <ga...@ma...> - 2005-12-27 21:52:45
|
Hi John, On the comment below -- I'm pretty sure that the psvn being passed to PG::new() is extraneous. It is not used as best I can remember. I've been planning to take it out at some point, but I guess I never remembered to do it when I had sufficient time to check the consequences. I'm 99% sure that it is never used. Take care, Mike On Dec 27, 2005, at 1:58 PM, John Jones wrote: > In trying to see what might be the matter, I was confused by the > passing of psvn to WeBWorK::PG::new, which then gets passed > forward. It looks like the psvn value which is passed is never > used. Instead, the routines are extracting it from $set (which is > where the error comes from). "Only dead fish swim with the stream." |