Re: [WWdevel] [WWdevel]: Library Browser (SetMaker) question: "combining up"

[John J. <jj...@as...>]

Michael Gage wrote:

> Privately (but not formally) I had used the convention that when 
> constructing a directory contaning a 
> .pg file and auxiliary files   that the  directory name was related to 
> the .pg name   e.g.  prob1/prob1.pg
>
> Would it be reasonable to add that condition to the default method for 
> "combining up"?  I know the rules I used for making these problems, 
> but I haven't searched through the rest of the problem collections, so 
> perhaps there are reasons not to do this.

I am not sure I understand.  Is the suggestion that outside of other 
hints like =library-combine-up, a directory named this-directory 
containing one pg file problem.pg should not be combined up because the 
name of the pg file doesn't match the name of the directory?

> On Aug 31, 2005, at 8:20 AM, Davide P. Cervone wrote:
>
>> Yes, that was the problem.  I still can't think of a better name, can 
>> anyone else?  "Toplevel Problems"?  "Unclassified Problems"?
>
I don't have strong feelings about this, especially since it should be a 
moot question (a standard problem collection probably shouldn't have 
problems there).  But, now that I think about it, Unclassified might be 
better than Main or Toplevel.  The latter two could be construed as 
meaning that these problems are especially important.  But, Unclassified 
could inaccurate if a problem is the lone problem in its 
classification.  How about "Misc. Problems"?

John