From: Sam H. <sh...@ma...> - 2005-08-29 18:18:28
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Aug 29, 2005, at 12:31, Michael Gage wrote: > We actually specifically decided against it, since we didn't want > the instructor's answers mixed in > with the student's answers. I suppose we can revisit the decision, > but there are good reasons > not to record instructor answers, so if we are going to think about > again it we should do it thoroughly. On Aug 28, 2005, at 11:56, John Jones wrote: > For the last item, another approach to dealing with this would be > to put the information in the answer log (which, as you pointed > out, is basically redundant with the transaction log). We would > need to add another field for whether something was a submit/ > preview/check, and then display that in the "Show Past Answers" > page. That might be a good idea in any case since it makes it easy > for individual teachers to research student complaints. I think this is worthwhile, and we could also add a flag for who the "real" user was who submitted/checked/previewed the answer. -sam -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDE1Fr14CQX+2WvVgRAscGAKCYQw8im6EbGuU3XMsooqtVwD3zVwCgtJ8v N/50Hw2t3r3KekN+pFPADOY= =Rkxk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |