From: William Z. <wz...@cs...> - 2005-01-25 21:52:21
|
Just found time to look over arch. It is very cool! Perhaps more importantly for me, I have never understood cvs completely, but arch makes perfect sense. On Jan 10, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Sam Hathaway wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Michael Gage wrote: > >> We've been considering this, but haven't made any moves yet -- mostly >> because we've >> had other things to do. Sam, John, do you have any comments? > > Arch is more ambitious and has a greater "cool" factor, but I think > Subversion is the way to go right now, especially since it's possible > to convert a repository from CVS to Subversion: > <http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/apas11.html>. > -sam > >> On Jan 10, 2005, at 11:52 AM, William Ziemer wrote: >> >>> Most of the projects I link with are going to subversion: >>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ >>> Maybe use this for the problem database? >>> Good to see you all again, >>> Bill > > -- William Ziemer Mathematics Department CSULB |