From: Samuel H. <sh...@ma...> - 2005-01-15 19:51:10
|
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Mike Gage via activitymail wrote: > Commented out escapeHTML() of warning messages since it prevented > using tables when outputing info about answer evaluators. > > Can someone tell me whether there is another reason why not allowing > HTML in warning messages is or would be important? If so we can > figure out another way to debug answer evaluators. The intent is not to prohibit HTML in warning messages but to allow the literal display of characters like '<' and '&' in warnings. It's going to be a problem if we need to pass HTML through the warning facility, since there would be no way for the warning handler to differentiate between a warning that just happened to use characters like '<' and '&' (say, generated by Perl), and a warning that has purposeful HTML in it that ought to be passed through unmolested. -sam |