Re: [WWdevel] Re: CVS alternative

[Michael G. <ga...@ma...>]

>
>  Problems start in the non-tagged side, basically however we find=20
> them.=A0 Once this thing is initialized, I guess we can start filling=20=

> that up with lots of pg files.=A0 When it gets tagged, then it is =
moved=20
> to the tagged-side, which will be organized to mirror the heirarchical=20=

> topic structure of the database.
>
>  We may not be able to "polish" every problem, but as that is done, it=20=

> simply gives an updated version of the problem on the tagged side.=A0=20=

> The setup as described above basically gives up on the notion of=20
> systematically polishing problems.=A0 If we want to keep that alive, =
we=20
> should have 3 basic sub-divisions (raw, tagged, and=20
> tagged-and-polished).=A0 Actually, this 3-part version might be a good=20=

> way to go.
>
I like the 3 part version.  Possibly even a 4th part for  problems=20
which can be used as models for future problems (exhibiting best=20
practices, etc. etc.)  This fourth part could be fairly small however,=20=

and may not need to be a CVS.

Take care,

Mike