From: Sam H. <sh...@ma...> - 2005-01-10 17:16:31
|
On Jan 10, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Michael Gage wrote: > We've been considering this, but haven't made any moves yet -- mostly > because we've > had other things to do. Sam, John, do you have any comments? Arch is more ambitious and has a greater "cool" factor, but I think Subversion is the way to go right now, especially since it's possible to convert a repository from CVS to Subversion: <http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/apas11.html>. -sam > On Jan 10, 2005, at 11:52 AM, William Ziemer wrote: > >> Most of the projects I link with are going to subversion: >> http://subversion.tigris.org/ >> Maybe use this for the problem database? >> Good to see you all again, >> Bill |