Re: [openvrml-develop] OpenVRML 0.16.0 vs. Microsoft cl 14.0

[Braden M. <br...@en...>]

On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:53 -0700, Greg Roelofs wrote:
> > What I'm seeing appears to be rather severe memory corruption. (Well, as
> > if that's ever mild.) The code as it is in CVS doesn't even make it
> > through static initialization before keeling over. I was able to get
> > past that with a couple of tweaks (specifically, converting
> > component_registry and profile_registry to singletons); but that just
> > led to more bizarre problems.
> 
> Is it possible the default C library changed and you're still linking
> against other libraries that were compiled the old way?

The project files included in the OpenVRML distribution don't link with
any libraries outside the source distribution (that aren't included with
the compiler/Platform SDK). So, no... I don't think this is the issue.

Per the other message I just posted, the static initialization problems
are only showing up when OpenVRML is built as static libraries. Very
strange.

-- 
Braden McDaniel                           e-mail: <br...@en...>
<http://endoframe.com>                    Jabber: <br...@ja...>