|
From: -oli- <ol...@fr...> - 2002-04-09 07:15:13
|
Hi!
I will give some comments to my planned work on OpenVRML in this message:
- I need the OpenAL support in OpenVRML for my own puroposes, as I'm
writing a diploma thesis about virtual acoustics.
- I will use, develop and compile it under Windows (98 and 2k) with M$
VisualC++ 6.0, and as I don't know much about makefiles, I will _not_ be
able to produce a patch which enables compiling with "--with-openal". I'm
inserting my own source with "#if use_openal" at the moment, so someone
else can adapt the makefiles.
- I am using the OpenAL distribution from the Creative website (see Tom's
mail).
At 20:43 08.04.2002 -0400, you wrote:
> * *Yes*, I would accept a patch for OpenAL-based audio support.
> * This support would be disabled by default. If someone wanted
> to build with it, they'd need to configure with
> "--with-openal" or somesuch.
> * If OpenVRML also had support for some other audio solution (I
> mentioned GStreamer before, and I still think it's our best
> bet under Linux), I would not be inclined to spend too much of
> *my own* energy maintaining multiple audio solutions in
> parallel.
That's okay.
>If you think I'm trying to steer you toward GStreamer instead of OpenAL,
>you'd be right. However, I appreciate that you may have your own
>motivation for wanting to use OpenAL, and I have no intention of
>belaboring the issue beyond this posting. I appreciate that your work
>*will* improve OpenVRML, even if it's not exactly what I'd do. :-)
I looked on the GStreamer website. It seems to be a powerful solution for
media processing, but there is no windows support (yet), so I cannot use it
at this time.
Thanx for answering my questions!
Regards
-oli-
(Oliver Baum)
|