Re: [Openvrml-develop] Doxygen documentation

[Braden M. <br...@en...>]

On 11 Aug 2001 14:05:43 +0200, luc...@li... wrote:
> I would like to know if someone has been able to succesfully build the 
> doxygen documentation for the latest version of the library. In my 
> attempt to build it i've seen that the hierarchy is not complete and 
> many  sub classes are missing.

What level of success are you looking for? It is quite true that many
classes remain undocumented, and doxygen will spew lots of warning
messages to that effect. But it should output docs for the classes that
*are* documented.

> Also i would like to say that i solved my linking problems and that, 
> besides the OPENVRML_DLL_IMPORT missing symbol, i had them because i 
> am  using Vrml97Parser/Scanner classes that were not exported in the 
> DLL. I solved the problem decorating the classes with _declspec
> (dllexport) and recompiling the library.

That is the case because I had not intended these classes to be part of
the public API. The only reason they aren't in a private namespace in
VrmlScene.cpp is that I haven't figured out a way for ANTLR to
accommodate that. :-)

So, I'm curious how you're using these classes. If there is a good
reason to make them part of the public API, we can do that.

-- 
Braden McDaniel                           e-mail: <br...@en...>
<http://endoframe.com>                    Jabber: <br...@ja...>