Re: [Openvrml-develop] Status update

[clayton c. <dr...@sm...>]

Josip Almasi wrote:
> 
> John Richardson wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > My suggestion would be to provide the models to the Web3D consortium. They
> > can be advertised to "work" with certain versions of openvrml on certain
> > platforms. The consortium probably has the bandwidth to store and
> > distribute.
> 
> Agreed only partialy. I didn't find much usefull staff in vrml content:
> no gpl nor lgpl inside. So I have license problems with both gnu and
> commercial development. And I'm not satisfied with universal media.
> I think there's need for lglp-ed vrml content repository.
> Sourceforge would be appropriate for such a thing, with requriement to
> use cvs anonymous access or download the entire repository.
> 
> > Also, when a certain level of satisfaction with the distribution is
> > reached, prebuilt executables or even a source distribution can be built
> > and then offered to distribution outlets such as MacAddict, MacFormat, PC
> > world as freeware to be distributed along with their magazines. British
> > magazines love to give away tons of freeware.
> 
> I'm avare of this.
> 


i d like to offer my two senses!!


j/k 

id like to see a repository of vrml objects/worlds that work:
a) cross browser/viewer
b) cross platform