Re: [Openvrml-develop] Doing the Right Thing with libantlr

[Braden M. <br...@en...>]

On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Braden McDaniel wrote:

> [Note: None of what I'm about to say applies to any changes before
> 0.9.0. But I wanted to go ahead and ask about this stuff while it's fresh
> on my mind.]
>
> Right now, we export a bunch of symbols and install a bunch of header
> files associated with libantlr. Since it's conceivable that The Real
> libantlr could coexist on a system with our library, I think this is
> Bad Form.
>
> I think the need to do all of this could be eliminated if there's
> agreement that we don't need to be making the parser public. If we don't
> need *those* symbols/headers public, I don't think we need any of the
> ANTLR stuff public either.

On second thought, going ahead with this for 0.9.0 seems like a good idea.
Unless there are objections, I'm going to at least tweak the build scripts
to stop installing those headers. I'll probably put off cleaning up any
symbols we might be inadvertently leaking publicly.

-- 
Braden N. McDaniel                              e-mail: br...@en...
<http://endoframe.com>                          Jabber: br...@ja...