From: Braden M. <br...@en...> - 2009-03-02 17:35:26
|
If you've been following SourceForge activity at all, you've probably noticed that after allowing the service's feature set to languish for some years, the developers have made many tangible improvements to the site over the last several months. One of the most significant of these is what they call "hosted apps". This makes some popular open source Web-based tools available for use by SourceForge projects. And one of the hosted apps now available is the popular "trac" project management tool. Now, I think most would agree that SourceForge's "trackers" (what it calls its bug/patch/etc. reporting and management facility) kind of suck. They're missing many features common to modern tools in this space; and the improvements SourceForge is making to this service (the "Tracker Beta" you can opt into on the site) are, IMO, quite modest. So, I am seriously considering migrating bug and task tracking to trac. I've already enabled trac as a hosted app for OpenVRML. trac also includes a wiki; and to familiarize myself with what it can do I've started migrating Zack Smith's Windows build instructions to there: <https://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/openvrml/wiki/BuildOpenvrmlOnWindows> I've made several updates to its text for consistency with what's on the trunk now; but it still needs some more work. If anyone has other ideas for good wiki topics, please chime in. Anyway, I thought I'd let folks know this is probably coming. Anyone who wants to tell me why migrating to trac is a horrible idea, please speak up. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <br...@en...> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <br...@ja...> |