From: Bart K. <me...@ba...> - 2008-08-18 16:19:26
|
Sent this to openvpn-users a while back with no response. Perhaps it is a question better targeted @ the developers? --Bart Bart Kus wrote: > Thu Aug 07 19:24:06 2008 OpenVPN 2.1_rc9 i686-pc-mingw32 [SSL] [LZO2] > [PKCS11] built on Jul 31 2008 > > [...] snip! [...] > > Thu Aug 07 19:24:53 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c > Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,88] > IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is > too small. (code=122) > Thu Aug 07 19:25:03 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c > Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,89] > IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is > too small. (code=122) > Thu Aug 07 19:25:12 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c > Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[50,0] Rx=[6,90] > IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is > too small. (code=122) > > ...etc... > > Anyone know what might be going wrong here? Would more data help? > > Thanks for any help, > > --Bart > > |
From: Bart K. <me...@ba...> - 2008-08-18 23:34:08
|
Bart Kus wrote: > Sent this to openvpn-users a while back with no response. Perhaps it is > a question better targeted @ the developers? > > --Bart > > > Bart Kus wrote: > >> Thu Aug 07 19:24:06 2008 OpenVPN 2.1_rc9 i686-pc-mingw32 [SSL] [LZO2] >> [PKCS11] built on Jul 31 2008 >> >> [...] snip! [...] >> >> Thu Aug 07 19:24:53 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,88] >> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is >> too small. (code=122) >> Thu Aug 07 19:25:03 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,89] >> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is >> too small. (code=122) >> Thu Aug 07 19:25:12 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[50,0] Rx=[6,90] >> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is >> too small. (code=122) >> >> ...etc... >> >> Anyone know what might be going wrong here? Would more data help? >> >> Thanks for any help, >> >> --Bart >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel > The list is looping this message. I don't know why. :( --Bart |
From: James Y. <ji...@yo...> - 2008-08-19 17:10:11
|
Bart Kus wrote: > Sent this to openvpn-users a while back with no response. Perhaps it is > a question better targeted @ the developers? > > --Bart > > > Bart Kus wrote: >> Thu Aug 07 19:24:06 2008 OpenVPN 2.1_rc9 i686-pc-mingw32 [SSL] [LZO2] >> [PKCS11] built on Jul 31 2008 >> >> [...] snip! [...] >> >> Thu Aug 07 19:24:53 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,88] >> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is >> too small. (code=122) >> Thu Aug 07 19:25:03 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,89] >> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is >> too small. (code=122) >> Thu Aug 07 19:25:12 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[50,0] Rx=[6,90] >> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call is >> too small. (code=122) Are you using a non-standard MTU size? This error indicates that a write operation to the TAP driver is impossibly small, i.e. the packet isn't even large enough to contain an ethernet header (for dev tap) or IPv4 header (for dev tun). James |
From: Bart K. <me...@ba...> - 2008-08-20 19:36:07
|
James Yonan wrote: > Bart Kus wrote: >> Sent this to openvpn-users a while back with no response. Perhaps it >> is a question better targeted @ the developers? >> >> --Bart >> >> >> Bart Kus wrote: >>> Thu Aug 07 19:24:06 2008 OpenVPN 2.1_rc9 i686-pc-mingw32 [SSL] >>> [LZO2] [PKCS11] built on Jul 31 2008 >>> >>> [...] snip! [...] >>> >>> Thu Aug 07 19:24:53 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >>> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,88] >>> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call >>> is too small. (code=122) >>> Thu Aug 07 19:25:03 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >>> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[49,0] Rx=[6,89] >>> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call >>> is too small. (code=122) >>> Thu Aug 07 19:25:12 2008 write to TUN/TAP [State=AT?c >>> Err=[c:\src\21\tap-win32\tapdrvr.c/2268] #O=10 Tx=[50,0] Rx=[6,90] >>> IrpQ=[1,1,16] PktQ=[0,1,64]]: The data area passed to a system call >>> is too small. (code=122) > > Are you using a non-standard MTU size? This error indicates that a > write operation to the TAP driver is impossibly small, i.e. the packet > isn't even large enough to contain an ethernet header (for dev tap) or > IPv4 header (for dev tun). > > James Negatory. MTU is 1500: MTU MediaSenseState Bytes In Bytes Out Interface ------ --------------- --------- --------- ------------- 4294967295 1 0 23833 Loopback Pseudo-Interface 1 1500 1 2450317296 362556326 Local Area Connection 1500 5 0 0 Local Area Connection 2 Also, I'm using the TUN device. Here's my config: client dev tun proto tcp remote <CENSORED> resolv-retry infinite nobind persist-key persist-tun pkcs12 bkus1.p12 verb 3 ns-cert-type server route-delay 30 route-method exe The server grants the connection, an IP is assigned, but when traffic tries to move, I keep seeing those errors and nothing gets communicated. --Bart |