From: Jan J. K. <ja...@ni...> - 2014-07-11 14:55:09
|
Hi, Gert Doering wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:51:54AM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > >> On 11/07/14 10:00, Philipp Hagemeister wrote: >> >>> On modern systems, topology subnet should always be set, but it's >>> missing in the configuration file. >>> Add it with a short explanation. >>> >> NACK >> There are a few annoying issues with >> topology subnet >> esp when using server side things like >> route <remote subnet> <mask> >> >> that will *fail* with 'topology subnet' ; until this is fixed this >> should NOT be considered the default. >> > > Well, it's on the roadmap, and Arne has already sent a patch. > > So, what other issues exist? This is the only one I'm aware of... > (and the recent trac ticket about "topology subnet not working on > FreeBSD 10" turned out to be local confusion...) > > > hmm I thought I had a TRAC ticket on this but I cannot find it anymore... I recall some minor annoyances all having to do with needing to explictly add a gateway for the server-side routes. I'm 99.9% confident that Arne's one-liner will have fixed them. With those annoyances gone I'd even be in favor of making 'topology subnet' the default for the 2.4 release :) cheers, JJK |