Thread: [openupload-devel] better way to alert that the notification email is important?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
tsdogs
|
From: Jonathan M. <jm...@lw...> - 2011-03-29 15:14:01
|
Very happy with openupload and have tweaked it a bit to really make it slick for us. But, for whatever reason, people don¹t seem to want to do the notification part post-upload. Do others have this issue? Basically, I get alerted by the receiver that the file is there from the sender and I have to pop-in as admin and see the file id then send the link to the receiver. Have other run into this? If so, have you done anything to mod the notification page or something to let the senders know just uploading doesn¹t do it and you NEED to let the person receiving know how to get the file(s) you are sending? Any help appreciated. Jonathan ................................ Jonathan Mergy <jm...@lw...> Director Of Technology Lick-Wilmerding High School 755 Ocean Ave, SF CA 94112 P:415.585.1725 x365 http://www.lwhs.org |
|
From: Alessandro B. <ts...@br...> - 2011-03-30 09:30:49
|
Il 29/03/2011 17:05, Jonathan Mergy ha scritto: > Very happy with openupload and have tweaked it a bit to really make it > slick for us. But, for whatever reason, people don’t seem to want to do > the notification part post-upload. Do others have this issue? Basically, > I get alerted by the receiver that the file is there from the sender and > I have to pop-in as admin and see the file id then send the link to the > receiver. > > Have other run into this? If so, have you done anything to mod the > notification page or something to let the senders know just uploading > doesn’t do it and you NEED to let the person receiving know how to get > the file(s) you are sending? > > Any help appreciated. > > Jonathan Hi Jonathan, I'm not sure I do understand the problem, but I guess you are referring to the fact that the person uploads the file and then is requested more information about the uploaded file. Your users are lazy so they don't send the e-mail to the correct person? Alessandro |
|
From: Jonathan M. <jm...@lw...> - 2011-03-30 13:13:17
|
> Hi Jonathan, > I'm not sure I do understand the problem, but I guess you are referring > to the fact that the person uploads the file and then is requested more > information about the uploaded file. > Your users are lazy so they don't send the e-mail to the correct person? > > Alessandro Correct. I don't know if it is lazy, but yes the notification side is a step that is not being done. We have been using it more for new hires to submit video or other large files for job interviews, so we are dealing with people who are new to openupload. Jonathan ................................ Jonathan Mergy <jm...@lw...> Director Of Technology Lick-Wilmerding High School 755 Ocean Ave, SF CA 94112 P:415.585.1725 x365 http://www.lwhs.org |
|
From: Alessandro B. <ts...@br...> - 2011-03-30 14:20:20
|
Il 30/03/2011 15:13, Jonathan Mergy ha scritto: > >> Hi Jonathan, >> I'm not sure I do understand the problem, but I guess you are referring >> to the fact that the person uploads the file and then is requested more >> information about the uploaded file. >> Your users are lazy so they don't send the e-mail to the correct person? >> >> Alessandro > > Correct. I don't know if it is lazy, but yes the notification side is a step > that is not being done. We have been using it more for new hires to submit > video or other large files for job interviews, so we are dealing with people > who are new to openupload. I'm still not sure I do understand the problem, sorry. The concept around this version of Open Upload is I give it to the internal people to send a file to external people. I (the administrator) am not supposed to know to who my users send the file to, and surely open upload cannot know the destination of a file (or is there any magic I am missing?). Now the problem could be if I give external people an account (either registered or not) to send files to internal people. This is a different way of using it, as I need someone to upload a file for me, and this led me to implement the "invitation" in 0.5 version (which is in svn and not yet ready, although I have used it in production and it seems to work fine) There is another way of using it, which is internal users upload files for internal users, and here the assigntouser plugin probably will solve the issue. For what I see in the first case I cannot think of any way to solve it, unless modifying the template (whith a HUGE warning) or code and force the people to specify to who to send the e-mail to. Let me know if this helps you in any way. Alessandro |
|
From: Florent V. <flo...@en...> - 2011-03-30 14:26:29
Attachments:
florent_vallee.vcf
|
Hi, Is it possible to use CAS Authentication with OpenUpload ? If so, how ? Thx |
|
From: Alessandro B. <ts...@br...> - 2011-03-30 14:39:01
|
Il 30/03/2011 16:26, Florent Vallée ha scritto: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to use CAS Authentication with OpenUpload ? If so, how ? > Somebody has implemented the HTTP auth module (so open upload authenticates with the HTTP credentials) But have not the mails at hand. Once this works it's only a matter to configure the web server to authenticate. Alessandro |
|
From: Jonathan M. <jm...@lw...> - 2011-03-30 15:38:28
|
> For what I see in the first case I cannot think of any way to solve it, > unless modifying the template (whith a HUGE warning) or code and force > the people to specify to who to send the e-mail to. I think I will try this. Perhaps even something on the upload page itself that notes to let the user you want to send the file to know about it "Next Step: Notify the person the files can be downloaded" or something. Jonathan ................................ Jonathan Mergy <jm...@lw...> Director Of Technology Lick-Wilmerding High School 755 Ocean Ave, SF CA 94112 P:415.585.1725 x365 http://www.lwhs.org |
|
From: Daniel B. <da...@fi...> - 2011-03-30 15:42:36
|
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 16:20 +0200, Alessandro Briosi a écrit : > Il 30/03/2011 15:13, Jonathan Mergy ha scritto: > > > >> Hi Jonathan, > >> I'm not sure I do understand the problem, but I guess you are referring > >> to the fact that the person uploads the file and then is requested more > >> information about the uploaded file. > >> Your users are lazy so they don't send the e-mail to the correct person? > >> > >> Alessandro > > > > Correct. I don't know if it is lazy, but yes the notification side is a step > > that is not being done. We have been using it more for new hires to submit > > video or other large files for job interviews, so we are dealing with people > > who are new to openupload. > > I'm still not sure I do understand the problem, sorry. > > The concept around this version of Open Upload is I give it to the > internal people to send a file to external people. I (the administrator) > am not supposed to know to who my users send the file to, and surely > open upload cannot know the destination of a file (or is there any magic > I am missing?). > > Now the problem could be if I give external people an account (either > registered or not) to send files to internal people. > This is a different way of using it, as I need someone to upload a file > for me, and this led me to implement the "invitation" in 0.5 version > (which is in svn and not yet ready, although I have used it in > production and it seems to work fine) Great, invitation to let external users upload a file is a feature I'm really interested in. Is 0.5 planed to be released any time soon ? Regards, Daniel > > There is another way of using it, which is internal users upload files > for internal users, and here the assigntouser plugin probably will solve > the issue. > > For what I see in the first case I cannot think of any way to solve it, > unless modifying the template (whith a HUGE warning) or code and force > the people to specify to who to send the e-mail to. > > Let me know if this helps you in any way. > Alessandro > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and > publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf > _______________________________________________ > Openupload-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openupload-devel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SARL. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Technopôle Montesquieu 33650 MARTILLAC Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Fax : 05 56 64 15 32 Mail: da...@fi... Web : http://www.firewall-services.com |
|
From: Alessandro B. <ts...@br...> - 2011-03-30 16:31:34
|
Il 30/03/2011 17:42, Daniel Berteaud ha scritto: > Great, invitation to let external users upload a file is a feature I'm > really interested in. Is 0.5 planed to be released any time soon ? > > Regards, Daniel Well, this is a good question :) Lately I have so reduced spare time that I haven't done much development on 0.5. Long time ago I wanted to release an alpha, but it needed more things to be released. I have a couple of 0.5 installations in production which seem to perform good, but it misses things I think might be crucial to call it a release. I've also been thinking on backporting this functionality to 0.4 which I think is one important feature missing from it. I'd really like to give you some more info. I absolutely want to push out a 0.5 version but it's taking more time than I thought. So, back to the original question. the answer is: 0.5 will be released, probably not soon unless somebody else steps up to help with it. Ciao, Alessandro P.S. If you are willing to experiment and have some knowledge of php/mysql you could try out svn version, and report. The installation must be done manually as the setup is not working. |
|
From: Daniel B. <da...@fi...> - 2011-03-30 16:47:07
|
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 18:31 +0200, Alessandro Briosi a écrit : > Il 30/03/2011 17:42, Daniel Berteaud ha scritto: > > Great, invitation to let external users upload a file is a feature I'm > > really interested in. Is 0.5 planed to be released any time soon ? > > > > Regards, Daniel > > Well, this is a good question :) > > Lately I have so reduced spare time that I haven't done much development > on 0.5. I can easily understand that ;) > > Long time ago I wanted to release an alpha, but it needed more things to > be released. > > I have a couple of 0.5 installations in production which seem to perform > good, but it misses things I think might be crucial to call it a release. Is there a list somewhere of those crucial things ? > > I've also been thinking on backporting this functionality to 0.4 which I > think is one important feature missing from it. This could be interesting, if easy enough. > > I'd really like to give you some more info. I absolutely want to push > out a 0.5 version but it's taking more time than I thought. > > So, back to the original question. the answer is: > 0.5 will be released, probably not soon unless somebody else steps up to > help with it. > > Ciao, > Alessandro > > P.S. If you are willing to experiment and have some knowledge of > php/mysql you could try out svn version, and report. > The installation must be done manually as the setup is not working. I'll try to install svn version when I find some spare time (I'm also running out of spare time, who decided a day should only be 24 hours ? ;)). My PHP/MySQL skills are very limited, but I'll try to report if I find something, and maybe provide patches for simple things. Regards, and thanks for your efforts on OpenUpload > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and > publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf > _______________________________________________ > Openupload-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openupload-devel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SARL. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Technopôle Montesquieu 33650 MARTILLAC Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Fax : 05 56 64 15 32 Mail: da...@fi... Web : http://www.firewall-services.com |
|
From: Daniel B. <da...@fi...> - 2011-03-30 14:43:53
Attachments:
openupload-0.4.2-http_auth_and_ldap.patch
|
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 16:38 +0200, Alessandro Briosi a écrit : > Il 30/03/2011 16:26, Florent Vallée ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to use CAS Authentication with OpenUpload ? If so, how ? > > > > Somebody has implemented the HTTP auth module (so open upload > authenticates with the HTTP credentials) > But have not the mails at hand. I think you're talking about my patch implementing the httpldap auth module (called httpldap because it just relies on the web server to validate credentials, and then uses the standard ldap module to get user/group information). I've attached the patch here. Regards, Daniel > > Once this works it's only a matter to configure the web server to > authenticate. > > Alessandro > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and > publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf > _______________________________________________ > Openupload-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openupload-devel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SARL. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Technopôle Montesquieu 33650 MARTILLAC Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Fax : 05 56 64 15 32 Mail: da...@fi... Web : http://www.firewall-services.com |
|
From: Alessandro B. <ts...@br...> - 2011-03-30 14:45:56
|
Il 30/03/2011 16:43, Daniel Berteaud ha scritto: > I think you're talking about my patch implementing the httpldap auth > module (called httpldap because it just relies on the web server to > validate credentials, and then uses the standard ldap module to get > user/group information). I've attached the patch here. > > > Regards, Daniel > Thanks for the prompt reply. Alessandro |