Re: [PATCH] Re: [Opentnl-general] I've been making some updates recently...

[Brad K. <br...@wi...>]

Cool,  I thought static_cast would be better, but I wanted to make the
error extra noticable if I was making invalid assumptions about some of
the non-RPC related code paths calling this code.  I'll send along that
assignment form shortly.

-Brad

Mark Frohnmayer wrote:
> Hey Brad,
> 
> Thanks for the patch... the contribution form has been updated.  I'll integrate this, but I think I'll set it to use static_cast rather than dynamic, since the code calls a function to check the class first which does a dynamic_cast already, and as written it will seg fault on a NULL pointer access anyway if the dynamic_cast fails :)
> 
> - Mark
>