Re: [PATCH] Re: [Opentnl-general] I've been making some updates recently...
Brought to you by:
mark_frohnmayer,
s_alanet
From: Brad K. <br...@wi...> - 2005-03-01 17:24:23
|
Cool, I thought static_cast would be better, but I wanted to make the error extra noticable if I was making invalid assumptions about some of the non-RPC related code paths calling this code. I'll send along that assignment form shortly. -Brad Mark Frohnmayer wrote: > Hey Brad, > > Thanks for the patch... the contribution form has been updated. I'll integrate this, but I think I'll set it to use static_cast rather than dynamic, since the code calls a function to check the class first which does a dynamic_cast already, and as written it will seg fault on a NULL pointer access anyway if the dynamic_cast fails :) > > - Mark > |