Re: [Opentnl-general] Function 'new' redefinition

[Mark F. <ma...@ga...>]

You're in the right place.  This has been fixed in CVS and we're going 
to do another souce tarball release today.

you can replace that line that defines the new operator with:
#include <new>

should fix your problem.

- Mark

Mark P Neyer wrote:

> Hi, it's me again with another question. I'm working on adding TNL to 
> the game engine that I'm making, and when I go to complile after 
> adding the line '#include <tnl.h>, it tells me that the function 'void 
> *operator new(size_t,void*) already has a body, which has been 
> definted in (MSFT Visual Studio.NET)\Vc7\include\new. I looked at this 
> definition,  as well as the definition of new in 'tnlTypes.h', and 
> they appeared to be the exact same thing. I  commented out the 
> function definition in tnlTypes.h and then told it to #include<new> 
> right there instead, and everything compiled fine. I haven't actually 
> made the TNL code /do /anything yet, so I can't be sure if this ruins 
> functionality. Is there any reason why 'new' was defined outside of 
> the TNL namespace?
>
> As an aside question, this is my first time joining any sort of open 
> source development mailing list. Am I asking the 'right kind' of 
> questions and is this the right place to ask them ? I'd hate to be 
> annoying everyone on the list ...
>
> Mark P Neyer