Re: [Opentac2-developers] Agenda for OpenTAC2 developement

[Seth M. <mr...@ph...>]

Vlada Djurovic wrote:
> --- Seth Milder <mr...@ph...> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi everyone!
>>
>>Please be sure that you've installed Maven
>>(http://maven.apache.org) and
>>check out the current code branch (opentac2-1-0). I
>>have reorganized
>>everything from the main trunk as per request by
>>Veljar. This includes:
>>
>>	1) Getting rid of mass amounts of unused cruft
>>(tld's, jars, etc.)
>>
>>	2) Moving all JSP's under the WEB-INF directory (to
>>WEB-INF/jsp);
>>
>>	3) Enforcing the notion that every page corresponds
>>to an action.	I.e.,
>>no referencing directly to a jsp.
>>
> 
> 
> This part is maybe slightly off-topic. I managed to
> checkout and build new branch, and I noticed that
> there are fewer JSP's in WEB-INF/jsp then there were
> in initial checkout. Is this OK?
> 

You are right. I still have some JSP's to migrate. I will do that today.


> 
>>The first thing I'd like to discuss is basic design.
>>The best way to
>>understand the system is to look at the file
>>schema/project-schema.xml.
>>I am sorry there are no UML diagrams. If someone has
>>a simple way of
>>doing this, that'd be great!
>>
>>The code is still recovering from major surgery, but
>>I think it is 
>>finally in a state where I think we can let the
>>hacking begin! Sorry it 
>>took so long, but I was first in CVS hell, followed
>>by jar hell and I 
>>did not want to subject anyone else to this. Anyhow,
>>I still have the 
>>old code up on opentac.gmu.edu, so we can at least
>>use that as a loose 
>>reference for the functional specs. The new code is
>>still largely broken 
>>due to significant changes in the way user security
>>is handled and also 
>>because of changes to the core schema
>>(schema/project-schema.xml).
>>
>>What does you guys think about everyone choosing
>>certain components of 
>>the code that you'll then "own?" We could almost go
>>through 
>>struts-config.xml and just pick actions or groups of
>>actions to work on.
>>
>>I think we should have a conference over IM so we
>>can all discuss this 
>>in real time.
>>
> 
> Maybe it's better to use IRC (just saying this because
> I don't use IM :-) ). And schedule it in some
> timezone-independent time.
> 

I am fine with that. Can you or Arun arrange this?

-- 
Seth Milder
Department of Physics and Astronomy
MS 3f3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA
--
Heisenberg may have been here.