Re: [Opensync-users] Slow-sync conflict?

[Xin Z. <xi...@gm...>]

在 2006-06-30五的 16:23 +0200，Christopher Stender写道： 
> Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 10:57 schrieb Christopher Stender:
> > Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 10:11 schrieb Christopher Stender:
> > > Hi Xin,
> > > >
> > > > Entry 2:
> > > > UID: pas-id-44A21F92000001E1
> > > > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> > > > <contact>
> > > > <Name>
> > > > <FirstName>Cindy</FirstName>
> > > > </Name>
> > > > <Telephone>
> > > > <Content>13817665288</Content>
> > > > <Type>CELL</Type>
> > > > </Telephone>
> > > > <UnknownNode>
> > > > <NodeName>X-IRMC-LUID</NodeName>
> > > > <Content>000042000000</Content>
> > > > </UnknownNode>
> > > > <FormattedName>
> > > > <Content>Cindy</Content>
> > > > </FormattedName>
> > > > <Uid>
> > > > <Content>pas-id-44A21F92000001E1</Content>
> > > > </Uid>
> > > > <Revision>
> > > > <Content>2006-06-28T06:20:02Z</Content>
> > > > </Revision>
> > > > <FormattedName>
> > > > <Content>Cindy</Content>
> > > > </FormattedName>
> > > > </contact>
> >
> > Hmm, I recognized that there are two "FormattedName" attributes.
> > Maybe this is the reason for the conflict, but I need the TRACE-Files
> > to verify this. I wrote a patch for opensync which genereates the
> > FN-Attribute because the K750i/D750i doesn't do that. Maybe Evolution
> > also genereate one. I try to reproduce this issue.
> 
> I committed a patch (r1077) which fixed this issue. Please check out svn 
> and try it again.

Great! All the slow-sync conflicts are gone now. Some other issues, like
no-name contact (<FormattedName/>) in phone book, disappeared either.

Then I found another issue: the number entered in "Home" field of phone
will go to "Business Phone" field of Evolution. While the evo-to-irmc
mapping is OK ("Business Phone" to "Work", "Home Phone" to "Home"). Is
this known before?

> Regards
> 
> 	Christopher