Re: [Opensync-users] Comparison of Umlauts support by irmc and syncml?

[<ach...@mn...>]

Hello Daniel,=20
=20
Zitat von Daniel Gollub <dg...@su...>:=20
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 16:54, ach...@mn... wrote:=20
> > My question:=20
> > Could I get right now a better umlauts support with syncml in compari=
son=20
> > with irmc?=20
> > Or are the problems caused by central library algorithms?=20
> =20
> Christopher Stender is working on this at the moment. The problem is th=
at t=3D=20
> he=3D20=20
> irmc-sync plugin is a ported plugin from multisync and includes own=3D2=
0=20
> conversation functions. But now OpenSync have to do the conversation jo=
b.=3D20=20
> This lead to a double-conversation of special chars like =3DC3=3DA4=3DC=
3=3DB6=3DC3=3DBC=3D=20
> =3DC3=3D9F.=20
Does this mean, that I could get better Umlauts support with Syncml?=20
As my SonyEricsson K750i is supporting Syncml somehow, I could give this =
a=20
try. Does anybody know a useable configuration for my mobile? As far as I=
 know=20
the details of the syncml plugin, I have to know the relevant database=20
namesfor contacts and calendar.=20
=20
> Christopher, can you please create an irmc-development branch and commi=
t yo=3D=20
> ur=3D20=20
> version of the irmc-plugin for testing?=20
I would be also interested in testing a side-branch. Just tell the suitab=
le=20
svn URL.=20
=20
One irmc-sync question:=20
What are the best settings for language conversion and codepage in the=20
configuration settings? My mobile phone did have some sever crashes when =
I=20
tried to sync with activated conversion in the irmc-sync plugin. I had to=
=20
perform a complete reset to get my mobile working again. I can only assum=
e,=20
that the central library and the irmc-sync plugin performed some double=20
conversions which lead to very undefined strings.=20
=20
=20
Thanks,=20
Achim=20