Re: [Opensync-users] Comparison of Umlauts support by irmc and syncml?

[Daniel G. <dg...@su...>]

On Thursday 25 May 2006 16:54, ach...@mn... wrote:

> My question:
> Could I get right now a better umlauts support with syncml in comparison
> with irmc?
> Or are the problems caused by central library algorithms?

Christopher Stender is working on this at the moment. The problem is that t=
he=20
irmc-sync plugin is a ported plugin from multisync and includes own=20
conversation functions. But now OpenSync have to do the conversation job.=20
This lead to a double-conversation of special chars like =C3=A4=C3=B6=C3=BC=
=C3=9F.

Christopher, can you please create an irmc-development branch and commit yo=
ur=20
version of the irmc-plugin for testing?

best regards,
Daniel