Re: [Opensync-users] SyncML a better way to go than IrMC?

[Markus W. <ma...@mw...>]

On Friday 06 January 2006 14:02, Armin Bauer wrote:
> yes, syncml is more actively developed at the moment. But at the moment
> the maturity of it is not as far as the irmc plugin (since it is not
> usable right now).

I read the SyncML plugin stuff on the wiki and got it compiled.

What do I need to use it over bluetooth? Or how could I make use of the http 
stuff? What would I need my Samsung d600 to do?
Is there any furter documentation on the Web?
I figure integration into kde is not yet developed?!

Keep up the work on SyncML!!

Markus