From: Dave H. <dav...@mb...> - 2005-08-15 09:18:03
|
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 10:39 +0200, Armin Bauer wrote: <snip /> > The main problem we saw were licensing issues: Mozilla is distributed > under a triple license so people can pick whatever license they like. > Software that would be distributed together with thunderbird would > normally need the same licenses but opensync is only distributed under > the LGPL and not under MPL or GPL. But i think we can solve this problem > somehow. IANAL, but ... The MPL is the only real issue. The LGPL s3 states: "3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library." So you have L/GPL you just need to dual license opensync under the MPL. Cheers Dave > > Armin > > Aaron Whitehouse wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > Sorry to bother you all, but I just posted a RFE on the Mozilla Bugzilla > > for them to get onto the Opensync bandwagon and thought that those who > > would like to see this feature may like to vote for the request, or add > > valuable input. > > > > The 'bug' can be found here: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303963 > > > > Regards, > > Aaron > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensync-users mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensync-users -- Dave Hall Dave Hall Consulting p +61 3 9754 5276 m +61 410 47 42 55 f +61 3 8610 0029 e dav...@mb... |