Re: [Opensync-users] Libsyncml

[Patrick O. <Pat...@gm...>]

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 23:52 +0200, Armin Bauer wrote:
> > This is not listed in your list above; on the other hand, I am not sure
> > whether this wouldn't belong into the SyncML server on top of the
> > library layers. In that case let me rephrase my question: will OpenSync
> > on top of libsyncml support a slow sync of contact and calender entries?
> >
> 
> definetly. opensync has a part that is called "Hashtables". It basically
> works like this:
[...]
> you can see it here:
> http://www.opensync.org/file/plugins/file-sync/src/file_sync.c

Great, so if I'm lucky it'll just work :-) However, I don't have
much time at my hands that I could use for this, so I'd prefer to wait
for a first working release candidate of OpenSync/libsyncml before
starting to compile and test it. I hope this is okay.

> the main problem is see with sync4j is that it uses java which makes it
> a lot less usable for the open source community in my opinion. so my
> approach is to write it in a low level language and the provide high
> level wrappers so that it is usable from python or java.

The client library itself is written in C++, which should integrate
pretty well into other languages, too. I agree with you about the
server, but wouldn't mind running it as it is either.

-- 
Bye, Patrick Ohly
--  
Pat...@gm...
pa...@co... (MakeCD related mails)
http://home.pages.de/~ohly/
http://makecd.core.de/ (MakeCD home page)