Re: [Opensync-users] Libsyncml

[Maciek B. <ma...@bo...>]

On Wednesday 13 July 2005 20:19, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> One question though: You use libwbxml, which changed its license from
> LGPL to GPL. Is there a way around that? Because it would be pretty
> pointless to have a non-GLP libsyncml, if it still requires a GPL
> library.

A question: what SyncML client stil uses wbxml these days?

I don't know of any, to be honest. In that case, we could live with the LGPL 
fork (which is not going to be really used after all)...

./Maciek