Re: [Opensync-users] Libsyncml

[Armin B. <arm...@de...>]

Ok, after i thought a bit about it and your persuasion work i changed
the license to LGPL. :)

Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Armin Bauer wrote:
>
>> So i think the whole GPL vs. LGPL boils down to the question:
>> Which is better for the project? A possible higher userbase with
>> companies using the library which might return something in the future
>> or a maybe lower userbase but a possible source of income for the
>> project?
>
>
> My opinion:
>
> If you want OpenSync to be adopted by projects like GNOME, libraries
> cannot be GPL. This is part of the policy of GNOME.
>
> I myself asked the question about a project I'm working on. I was really
> willing to make the library GPL, but for the sole reason of being able
> to use it in GNOME, I decided for LGPL. That still allow proprietary
> vendor to link against it.
>
> Just my CDN $.02
>
> Hub