Re: [Opensync-users] Libsyncml

[Dave H. <dav...@mb...>]

Hi Dan,

On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 18:21 -0700, Dan Mosedale wrote:
>  I did notice that libsyncml is GPL, while opensync itself is 
> LGPL.  Won't this cause a problem for folks that want to ship opensync 
> itself under the LGPL but not the GPL?

There is no problem linking GPL and LGPL code.

As long as the documentation is clear, then there will no issue.  As
both licenses require distribution of the source, it should be clear to
anyone working on the code what the deal is.

Cheers

Dave