|
From: Chris F. <cd...@fo...> - 2012-03-05 11:46:37
|
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:21:56PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > Well did you talk with some DD's? Maybe there would be an interest in a > least keeping in experimental for those you are brave enough. If you > really plan on making a private repo I could help you making the > packages as Debian compliant as possible so a potential future packager > might have no problems in reintegrating it (multiarch-compliant, > hardening, etc). All the binary packaging that I've done is in the binary-meta git repo, which can be found here: http://repo.or.cz/w/opensync/binary-meta.git If you would like to take a look at those packages, please do. Keep in mind that it uses external debian directories, since the binary-meta repo is really just a git repo of submodules. The main goal of binary-meta is to make it as easy as possible to build binary packages from the latest sources, even for end users. But that doesn't mean that the other details of the Debian packaging can't be improved. I'm sure there's lots of improvement that can be done. If what I'm saying doesn't really make sense, it will become more clear once you look at how binary-meta does what it does. :-) - Chris |