From: Peter H. <pe...@pd...> - 2012-03-01 10:13:36
|
On Wednesday 29 Feb 09:20:02 Chris Frey wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 05:19:45PM +0000, Peter Hargreaves wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > All went fine till I tried: > > make debian-all > > when I got > > ... > > configure: Checking to see if we can build Python bindings > > checking whether /usr/bin/python2.6 version >= 2.6... yes > > checking for version... 2.6 > > checking for platform... linux2 > > checking for script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages > > checking for extension module directory... > > ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.6/site- packages > > checking for headers required to compile python extensions... not found > > configure: error: Building python explicitly requested, but can't build > > python bindings > > make[1]: *** [debian/configure-python2.6-stamp] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory > > `/home/peter/binary-meta/debian/opensync-0.2x' > > make: *** [deb-os-0.2x-build] Error 2 > > > > Please advise? Thank you. > > Peter. > > Hi Peter, > > Sorry for the delay. > > Strange. I just ran a test here on oneiric and it worked. > > I assume you ran the dependency script under depscripts/ ? > I have python2.6-dev and 2.7-dev installed on my build test setup. > > > P.S. Any ideas why the lack of interest in opensync, are there > > alternatives? > There is libsynthesis, but I'm not that familiar with it. There are > paid services too, like google and funambol, I think. > > - Chris Hi Chris, Many thanks for getting back to me. I don't think I did run the dependency script under depscripts/ ? ! At the moment I'm having a go with SyncEvolution using the following HowTo: http://syncevolution.org/wiki/kde-akonadi I'll let you know if I return to Opensync. Thanks again. Peter. |