|
From: Chris F. <cd...@fo...> - 2011-10-28 17:28:35
|
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 04:27:02PM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > This advantage also has a significant downside: the rest of OpenSync has > no idea about the DevInf of the SyncML peer and thus cannot take that > into account when reading or writing the local database. It is also not > possible to provide the capabilities of the local side to the Synthesis > engine because there is not one single peer locally (group concept of > OpenSync). > > As a result, data will get lost when doing round-trip syncs. I'm not a SyncML expert, so I'm not familiar what this "DevInf" information will be, nor why we would lose it, nor why it might be important. :-( Can you give me an example of what might be missing? Thanks, - Chris |