|
From: Paul E. <blu...@bl...> - 2011-07-24 11:52:36
|
Chris Frey wrote: > I'm currently operating under the assumption that the "switch to git" > has already happened. :-) I have some time to work on opensync, and so > I've moved all my work there. > > The only thing that remains is finding an official git repo for people > to go to for official releases. Git is distributed, so it is inevitable > that people will have their own repos all over the globe. That is a good > thing. But we also need one place to point people to for the "latest and > greatest". > > For now, my opensync-cdf.git repo is that repo. And I am determined to > keep it up to date and to try to respond to anyone who asks questions > about it, or submits patches to it. I plan to merge quickly if at all > possible. I guess for me as a Git traditionalist I would prefer to have all the history there if possible, or at the very least have the author information correct. To that end I did some detective work and came up with the author mapping and successfully converted over the repository again (well, as far as I can tell) - the only author I was missing was "marka", but that person was only the direct author of one commit. In any case it should be easy to replay your commits on top of the newly converted repo if we decide to go this way. Daniel, what do you think? Can we push an official git repo somewhere? Cheers, Paul ----- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre |