|
From: Michael B. <mic...@cm...> - 2011-01-29 22:31:16
|
Hi Emanoil, On 01/28/11 19:22, Emanoil Kotsev wrote: > > I updated libwbxml from svn yesterday. Following observation was > made. If I build and install without uninstalling the old one I can > still build libsyncml, but after I removed the install target > directory I could not build libsyncml, because of the missing > includes and changes to the api. The second beta should work like the old version. You have only to include wbxml.h. The difference is that I moved wbxml.h into an own directory. If you think that this is not a lucky decision then it could be a solution to move wbxml.h again into the top level directory. > I didn't understand well if you are planning to release a compatible > libsyncml version, or should one update libsyncml and related. I have > also seen that you have introduced a fix for the 255 "unknown code" > issue. Thank you for this but I can not test it at the moment. If libsyncml does no longer compile then this could be an argument to revert the new wbxml directory for the header files. Best regards Michael -- ___________________________________________________________________ Michael Bell Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 70143 ZE Computer- und Medienservice Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 70135 Unter den Linden 6 mic...@cm... D-10099 Berlin ___________________________________________________________________ PGP Fingerprint: 09E4 3D29 4156 2774 0F2C C643 D8BD 1918 2030 5AAB |